Plaintiff will produce responsive documents only to the extent that such documents are in the possession, custody, or control of the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, as set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.Plaintiff's possession, custody, or control does not include any constructive possession that may be conferred by Plaintiff's right or power to compel the production of documents or information from third parties or to request their production from other divisions of the Department of Justice or agencies of the United States. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ [(f)3 (or)3 ( i)-1.9 (n t)-2.1 (hi)-2 (s t)-2.3 (i)-2 (t)-2.8 (l)-2 (e)4.7 (\224)4 ( w)1.1 (hich inc)3 (l)-1.9 (ude)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( r)3.8 (e)3.2 (qu)-10 (e)4.8 (st)-4.6 (s )-2 (f)2.7 (or)3 ( a)3.1 (dmi)-4 (s)-11.8 (si)-2.4 (on\))2.1 (;)-1.1 ( C)-3 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (. Sample California request for production of documents - SlideShare The district court where compliance is required has jurisdiction to resolve objections. (23)Tj << /ZaDb 41 0 R T* [(a)4 (ppe)4.8 (a)4 (r)2.1 (e)4.9 (d )9.1 (onc)14.1 (og)9.9 (e)4 (ni)-1.9 (c)13.9 (. f (9)Tj will be included in the production."] 2 "A statement that the party to whom a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling has been directed will comply with the particular demand shall state that the production, inspection, copying, testing, or sampling, and related activity demanded, will be allowed either in whole or in part, and . W n >> >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /DR 12 0 R [(A)1.1 (D)2 (M)4.9 (I)-1.8 (T)-3 (S)]TJ -8.482 -24 Td T* f [( D)2 (E)-2.9 (N)1.9 (I)-10.9 (E)-3.1 (D)1.9 (. Indeed, the Court has ordered the parties to disclose the likelihood that they will call those persons as witnesses, and Plaintiff has done so, reducing the list of 184 individuals and entities to 31 individuals whose testimony Plaintiff is very likely or likely to present at trial, either by live testimony or deposition. Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. T* [(doc)4 (um)-2 (e)4 (nt)-2 ( st)-4 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 ( \223)4.7 (G)2 (l)-22.7 (y)20.7 (pho)-10.8 (sa)2 (t)-2 (e)4 ( a)4.8 (ppe)-6.7 (a)4.7 (r)3 (s )-1.8 (t)-2.9 (o be)3.1 ( onc)4 (o)-9.1 (ge)-6.8 (ni)-2 (c)3.9 ( i)-1.9 (n m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (e)4.7 ( m)-2.7 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (e)4 ( c)3.2 (a)4.8 (us)-1.7 (i)-2 (n)-9.2 (g)9.1 ( )-9.1 (r)2.9 (e)3.2 (na)4 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-1.2 (e)3.1 ( )]TJ Promote the use of green energy by installing a solar system before completing the third phase of construction. -240.96 -24 Td (19)Tj General Objections The Department objects to each Interrogatory and Request insofar as it seeks production or disclosure of documents that require PWD or Raftelis Financial Consultants ("RFC") to undertake an extensive search for information not within its control or custody. 121.796 -24 Td 2031.050, that allow the propounding party to ask for updated information bearing on answers already made and later acquired or discovered documents, tangible things, land or other property.. 291.35 0 Td Continue Reading Avoiding the Technical Mistakes When Drafting Written Discovery. h /Resources 115 0 R Are You Following Up on Your Opponents Discovery Responses? endstream 67.32 0 Td /TT0 12 Tf BT endstream Providing such information in answering this interrogatory would be oppressive, unduly burdensome and unnecessarily expensive, and the burden of providing such information in answering this interrogatory is substantially the same or less for Defendant as for Plaintiff. (28)Tj [(pl)-1.1 (a)3.1 (i)-2 (nt)-1.1 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( pur)2.9 (por)3.9 (t)-2.7 (s)-1.1 ( t)-2 (o de)4.8 (f)3 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (e)3 ( t)-1.8 (he)3.9 ( t)-1.9 (e)4.7 (r)3 (m)-1.9 ( b)-20.8 (y)20.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (i)-2.9 (n)-9.1 (g)9 ( a)4.9 ( f)2.2 (i)-1.1 (v)-10.9 (e)4 (-)3.8 (pa)-6.7 (g)9.9 (e)4 ( b)-9.1 (a)3.9 (c)3.1 (k)-9 (gr)2.9 (ound doc)3.1 (u)-9.9 (m)-2 (e)4.8 (nt)-2.8 ( t)-2 (ha)4.8 (t)-2.8 ( doe)4.8 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-3.7 ( )]TJ [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /TT0 11.03 Tf [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ If you are not producing documents when your responses come due, state when the documents will be produced. q /Fm0 Do 286.67 0 Td Furthermore, Civil Investigative Demand 13009 was issued to Dentsply, not to third parties. /TT0 12 Tf 344.759 55.32 Td 2 regarding "DOJ." Attendance at such interviews was limited to, at most, the interviewee, Antitrust Division attorneys and staff, counsel for the interviewee (in some interviews), and a potential testifying expert economist (in some interviews). (18)Tj 1.0999999 0 0 1.0999999 -5.594463 -39.599996 cm [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-2.8 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( E)10.9 (P)-3 (A)1.9 (\222)2.1 (s )9 (H)2 (a)13.9 (z)-5.9 (a)4 (r)13 (d Ev)2 (a)15 (l)-1.9 (ua)13.9 (t)7.1 (i)-1.9 (on D)1.9 (i)-1.9 (v)10.8 (i)-1.9 (si)-4 (on, on)9 ( or)3 ( a)4.9 (bou)10 (t)-2.8 ( )9.9 (S)-3 (e)3 (p)10.9 (t)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-2 (be)4 (r)2.1 ( 4, )]TJ 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re 41 0 obj f /Resources 91 0 R /Resources 71 0 R Here are some examples of technology you can include in your objective: Network capabilities. Respondent objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks information that may be protected by the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, the joint defense privilege or any other privilege. 6 0 obj >> Responding party objects that it is unduly burdensome and overbroad. >> 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.286072 36 cm [( t)-2.8 (ha)4.7 (t)-1.8 ( t)-2.9 (he)4.7 ( c)3.2 (it)-4.1 (e)3.1 (d )]TJ T* endobj >> /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ /dotlessi /lslash /oe /scaron /zcaron 160 /Euro 164 /currency 166 67.32 0 Td W n /TT0 12 Tf Plaintiff further objects to this request to the extent that it relies upon the terms "statement" and "third parties." endobj [( t)-1.1 (hi)-2 (s )-2 (R)-4.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-3 (. /TT0 12 Tf q T* )-8 (M)-1.9 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-1.9 (o ot)-2.9 (he)4.8 (r)3 (w)1.1 (is)-3 (e)3 ( )]TJ This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association. [(of)3 ( C)-3 (i)-1.1 (vi)-2 (l)-2 ( P)-4.9 (r)3 (oc)4.8 (e)3.1 (dur)3.1 (e)4.8 (, Mo)-1.8 (ns)-12.8 (a)3 (nto)-1.9 (\222)1.1 (s )-1.8 (R)-3.1 (e)3 (sp)-1.6 (on)-1.6 (s)-1.8 (e)3.9 (s )-1.8 (a)3.8 (r)-7.8 (e)4 ( not)-1.9 ( )-9.2 (due)3.9 ( \223)3.1 (w)2 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (n t)-2 (hi)-2 (r)2.9 (t)-11.9 (y)19 ( \()3.9 (30)-9.9 (\))2 ( da)-5 (y)19 (s)-10.9 ( f)-6.1 (r)2 (om )-2 (t)-3 (he)3.1 ( da)4 (t)-2 (e)4.8 ( of)3 ( )]TJ f Notwithstanding said objections, no documents. 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 6.020233 36 cm (20)Tj << )-3.002 (\222)-4.297 (S)1.697 ( )-1.898 (R)3.203 (E)-14.408 (S)1.707 (P)-10.201 (ON)-2.701 (SES )-3.203 (T)-15.502 (O )-2.902 (P)-10.201 (L)8.504 (A)10.1 (I)-4.197 (NT)-16.305 (I)-5.402 (F)1.707 (F)1.797 (\222)8.695 (S)1.807 ( )-15 (F)1.697 (I)-4.297 (R)-8.705 (S)1.707 (T)-14.408 ( )-2.992 (R)4.297 (E)-4.398 (QU)-1.707 (E)-5.201 (S)2.6 (T)-15.392 (S )-1.506 (F)1.697 (OR)3.504 ( )-2.902 (AD)-1.697 (M)-3.303 (I)-5.402 (S)-9.197 (SI)-3.002 (ON)-1.697 (S)-11.998 ( )]TJ >> [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ 2. 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the interrogatory to those individuals and entities interviewed by Plaintiff pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009. /Contents [88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R] 3. /Contents [100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R] << endobj /TT1 12 Tf endobj 67.32 0 Td /Annots [] )]TJ 9 i)-2 (n P)-3.1 (l)-2 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (nt)-2 (i)-2.8 (f)3.7 (f)3 (s\222 A)2.2 (m)-1.9 (e)4 (nde)4.8 (d a)4 (nd S)-3.9 (uppl)-2.9 (e)4.8 (m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (a)3 (l )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (f)1.9 (or)3.8 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2.8 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons \()-8.4 (J)-10.2 (une)3.1 ( 29, 2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. (2)Tj /Length 156 0 R -6 -24 Td (5)Tj /TT0 12 Tf Below is a sample request for production of documents in a motor vehicle crash case that later settled for $750,000. Use Request for Production | California Courts | Self Help Guide The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. 19 0 obj T* Q q [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ -73.07 -24 Td A. Preparation and Interpretation of Requests for Documents (18)Tj /Annots [] Q Recently I received a telephone call from an attorney wanting to discuss whether opposing partys objections to her special interrogatories had any merit. Merely said, the Sample Objections To Request For Production Of Documents Pdf Pdf is universally compatible taking into consideration any devices to read. 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re -334.67 -24 Td endobj << endobj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re However, there is another issue that you should take very seriouslythe document response is not in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure section 2031.230., Continue Reading Nail Down Whether the Documents You are Seeking ever Existed and Where They are Now. T* q 23.207 -24 Td If deposing an organization, be descriptive. 63 0 obj These responses and objections are made without prejudice to, and are not a waiver of, Plaintiff's right to rely on other facts or documents at trial. /Annots [] Introduce a quality objective when you want to measure the quality control of your products during a project. T* 7 0 obj /Annots [] This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. T* /ordmasculine 188 /onequarter /onehalf /threequarters 192 /Agrave /Aacute /Acircumflex /Atilde f T* To the extent any of Defendant's document requests or its interrogatory seek documents or answers that include expert material, including but not limited to survey materials, Plaintiff objects to any such requests and interrogatory as premature and expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all responses to such requests, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s) in accordance with the time period for exchanging expert reports set by the Court. f T* [(c)4 (hr)3.8 (oni)-2.8 (c)4.8 ( t)-1.9 (ox)-10 (i)-2 (c)3 (it)-14 (y)29.1 ( st)-3.1 (udi)-2 (e)3 (s o)-10.9 (n g)10.8 (l)-22.7 (y)20.7 (phosa)1.3 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 ( )-10 (\()3.8 (a)3.2 (l)-1.1 (l)-2 ( 12-)2.9 (m)-1.9 (on)-10.9 (t)-1.1 (hs )-2 (or long)10.9 (e)-6.8 (r)3 (\))3.8 ( use)2.1 (d i)-1.9 (n t)-2 (he)3.9 ( )-10.8 (l)-2 (a)4 (t)-2 (e)4.8 (r)3 ( r)2.1 (e)4 (s)-10 (e)3.9 (a)3.2 (r)-6.1 (c)3.1 (h a)4 (nd )]TJ f 4. /Fm0 Do T* /TT0 12 Tf /Count 20 At the March 8, 1999 conference with the Court, Defendant's counsel suggested that interview memoranda were discoverable. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.7952 75.2636 Tm Q )2 (11)2 ( in )9.1 (P)-4.8 (l)-2 (a)14 (i)-1.9 (n)10.7 (t)7.1 (i)8.9 (f)2.2 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)3.2 (nd S)6 (up)9.9 (ple)11 (men)11.9 (t)-1.9 (a)3 (l )7.9 (R)-3.8 (e)14 (que)4.8 (s)8.1 (t)8.9 (s )-1.8 (f)1.1 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( )]TJ BT 253.343 -48 Td 1) The time to respond to a discovery request is 30 days after the Rule 26 (f) conference 2) Objections to Rule 34 [must] be stated with specificity 3) Production deadlines set within the ESI agreement must be adhered to 4) The producing party must state whether they are withholding . Plaintiff, by and through its attorneys, and pursuant to Rules 33 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court, responds and objects to Defendant Dentsply International, Inc.'s ("Dentsply") Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories as follows: 1. Aspose Ltd. 33 )10.8 (i)-1.9 (n P)5.1 (l)-1.1 (a)13.1 (i)-1.1 (n)9.9 (t)-2.7 (i)-2 (f)12.9 (f)3 (s\222)1.8 ( A)11.1 (m)-1.8 (e)4.7 (n)9.2 (de)4.8 (d a)14 (nd )9.1 (S)-3.9 (u)10.8 (ppl)-1.9 (e)13.9 (m)-1.9 (e)13.9 (nt)-2.8 (a)14 (l)-2 ( R)-3 (e)4 (q)10 (ue)4 (s)9 (t)-1.1 (s )-2 (fo)2 (r)4 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons)-1.8 ( \()3.7 (J)-10.9 (une)3 ( 29, )]TJ >> >> [(e)4 (va)4.8 (l)-2.7 (ua)4.7 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (be)2.8 (i)-1.9 (n)-10 (g)9.9 ( done)4 ( b)-10.7 (y)20.7 ( )-9.9 (Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (o dur)2 (in)-12.8 (g)10.7 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.1 ( 1)-9.9 (991 t)-2 (hr)2.9 (oug)10 (h 2017 p)-9.9 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (i)-1.1 (od )-10.8 (i)-2 (nvol)-1.2 (vi)-2 (ng)9.1 ( a)4.8 (ni)-1.9 (m)-2.8 (a)4.7 (l)-1.9 ( )]TJ 44.77 0 Td 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm /TT1 12 Tf ( )Tj PROPOUNDING PARTY: PAUL SAMPLE . Object to anything that is not relevant to the subject matter (no longer the standard) or not likely to lead to admissible evidence (no longer the standard). Boilerplate objections are becoming more and more common in response to each of the document requests. /Parent 15 0 R (10)Tj q -154.07 -24 Td See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(d). q Plaintiff further objects to this interrogatory as vague, ambiguous, overbroad, and unduly burdensome to the extent it asks Plaintiff to identify in detail "all facts known to these individuals and entities that are relevant to the DOJ's claims against Dentsply in this matter." 12 i)-1.9 (n )]TJ /Resources 107 0 R Response to Interrogatories . % [(2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. >> Cheat Sheet for Interrogatory and Discovery Objections 11 0 obj [(N)2 (o. (22)Tj /Rotate 0 /Length 149 0 R << 0 -24 TD << [(ot)-1.1 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.9 ( )]TJ >> >> (26)Tj 49.55 0 Td 156.829 43.19 Td Common mistakes and pitfalls in responses to Requests for Production of endstream << T* [(R)-2.1 (e)3 (q)10.9 (ue)3.2 (s)9.8 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (f)1.9 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (s)-1.9 (si)-4 (ons )8.8 (\()2.2 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, 2017\))3 (])-7.8 (. (24)Tj [(P)11 (L)-3 (A)1.9 (INT)-2.7 (I)-10.9 (FF)12.7 (\222)2.9 (S)-3.9 ( R)1.9 (E)-3.7 (Q)-2 (U)1.9 (E)-12.9 (S)-4 (T)-2.2 (S)-4 ( F)10.1 (O)-1.9 (R)1.9 ( A)2.9 (D)2 (M)3.1 (IS)-4 (S)-4.9 (IO)-4 (N)1.9 (S)-3.1 ( A)1.1 (N)2 (D)2 ( M)4.9 (O)-2 (N)2 (S)-4.8 (A)2.7 (N)2.1 (T)-3.8 (O)-2 (\222)3.8 (S)-4.8 ( R)1.9 (E)-2.9 (S)-3.1 (P)10.9 (O)-2.8 (N)2.8 (S)-4.8 (E)-3 (S)-3.1 ( )]TJ T* T* Plaintiff will treat this request as if it called for documents (1) that contain, include, or are derived from any statement made by a third party to the DOJ and (2) that were signed and/or adopted, formally or informally, by that third party. california discovery objections, request for production GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. 47 0 obj Plaintiff objects to Definition No. /Length 148 0 R /Parent 15 0 R To the extent that "during" is intended to mean "at the time of," Plaintiff objects to this definition as overbroad because it would call for materials unrelated to this action. )Tj /TT1 12 Tf -138.71 -24 Td 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 313.4768 86.2909 Tm 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re (7)Tj /TT0 12 Tf stream /TT0 11.03 Tf /Fm0 Do /CropBox [0 0 612 792] [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o obj)-1.1 (e)3.1 (c)3.9 (t)-1.8 (s )-2 (t)-3.1 (o t)-1.1 (he)3.1 ( e)4.8 (x)-9.9 (t)-2 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 ( pl)-2 (a)3.1 (i)-1.1 (nt)-2 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 ( de)4 (m)-2 (a)3.9 (nds )-1.8 (M)-1.9 (onsa)2.8 (nt)-2.8 (o r)3.8 (e)4 (sp)-1.8 (on)-1.8 (d )-1.8 (prior)1.2 ( t)-11.9 (o t)-2 (he)4 ( )]TJ Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, and document request to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or -3- different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. All rights reserved. Plaintiff can only know those facts, of which it is aware, that are known to such individuals and entities. 2. (6. T* ( )Tj T* Plaintiff further objects to this definition to the extent that it uses the undefined term "during." -287.434 -24 Td [(2016.050 \()2.9 (\223)4.9 ([)-7.8 (s])-8.1 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on 1013 a)3 (ppl)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (e)3 (s )-1.8 (t)-2 (o a)3.1 (n)-9.1 (y)19.9 ( m)-12.8 (e)4 (t)-1.9 (hod of)2.8 ( di)-1.9 (sc)2.8 (ove)4 (r)-16.9 (y)19 ( or)3 ( s)-10 (e)3.9 (r)2.1 (vic)-8 (e)3.9 ( of)-7.8 ( a)4.8 ( m)-1.9 (ot)-2.9 (i)-2 (on pr)3 (ovi)-2 (de)4.8 (d )]TJ /Type /Page 88.55 0 Td T* -44.76 -24 Td Responding party objects that it is unduly burdensome and overbroad. (18)Tj 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 4.691315 36 cm (25)Tj 96.837 -24 Td q /Rotate 0 See my blog Make Sure you are aware of the New Document Response Requirementsfor an updated analysis. )]TJ C)-3 (i)-2.8 (v. P)-4 (r)2.9 (oc)4.8 (. )25.903 (1)]TJ [(m)-1.1 (i)-2 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 a)4.8 (nd 404)-9.9 (1 of)2.1 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( hi)-2 (g)10.8 (h)-10.7 (-)2.9 (dose)2.8 (, a)4 (nd m)-12.8 (a)4 (l)-1.9 (e)4.7 ( 3023 of)3 ( t)-1.9 (he)3.9 ( m)-1.9 (i)-2 (d-)2.9 (dose)1.3 ( )-9.9 (g)9.9 (r)3 (oup)-9.1 (\224)3.9 ( a)3.2 (nd )]TJ )-9 (\224)3 ( Monsanto )]TJ Endnote. -180.35 -24 Td << /Rotate 0 (7)Tj << T* endobj T* /Type /Page /GS0 gs This is a preview of the sample document sold by LegalDocsPro on scribd.com /Contents [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R] )-10.7 ( Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ /TT0 12 Tf (8)Tj [(t)-2 (hi)-1.1 (s )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.9 (que)3.2 (st)-3.9 ( )10.8 (a)3.1 (s )-1.8 (wr)5 (i)-1.8 (t)-2.1 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (n. Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (o )]TJ -103.32 -24 Td /TT0 9.96 Tf The Southern District of New York again illustrates the point. /TT1 12 Tf Among other things, the defendant objected "to the extent that [the request] is overly broad and unduly burdensome." T* >> ( )Tj [(P)-3.1 (r)2.9 (oc)3.1 (e)4.9 (dur)3 (e)3.2 ( \247 2033.010, )]TJ /Filter /FlateDecode endobj /Name (Headers/Footers) (16)Tj A specific response may repeat a general objection for emphasis or some other reason. 1 g Sys (1993) 13 CA4th 976, 991 (pdf) (reversed on other grounds) and CEB 8:10. [(t)-1.1 (hi)-2 (s )-2 (R)-4.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-3 (. T* 4. /XObject 146 0 R (15)Tj 7. (4)Tj (18)Tj /TT1 12 Tf (2)Tj In the course of its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff interviewed a number of individuals, but interviewed none pursuant to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009, a document request issued to Dentsply. T* T* 16 0 obj stream endstream (20)Tj 33.452 -24 Td 25.928 -24 Td q 36 0 Td T* (24)Tj (1)Tj 252.96 0 Td [(t)-1.9 (ha)4.7 (t)-2.7 ( t)-2 (he)4.7 ( c)4 (i)-1.9 (t)-2 (e)3.9 (d doc)3.2 (um)-1.9 (e)3.8 (nt)-1.8 ( )]TJ Rule 33 (Interrogatories to Parties) also requires specificity when making objections. T* (25)Tj 1 0 obj [(st)-2.2 (udi)-2 (e)3.9 (s.)-1.8 ( )-1.8 (Notwi)-1.2 (t)-2.9 (hst)-4.8 (a)4.7 (ndi)-1.9 (ng Mo)-2 (ns)-3.9 (a)4.8 (nt)-1.9 (o\222)2.9 (s )-1.8 (ob)-1.8 (j)-2.9 (e)3.9 (c)3.2 (t)-2 (i)-1.1 (on, Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)3 (nto)-2 ( )]TJ 81.23 0 Td [(g)10.8 (l)-11.9 (y)29.1 (phosa)2.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 ( )-229 (be)13.9 (t)-1.9 (w)1.9 (e)3.2 (e)13.9 (n )-199 (199)9.9 (1 )-200.8 (t)-2 (h)10.8 (r)3 (oug)10 (h )-209.9 (2017. [(1985, )-229.9 (c)4.7 (onc)14 (l)-1.9 (ude)13.9 (d t)7.1 (ha)14.1 (t)-1.9 ( t)-1.2 (he)3.1 ( r)3.8 (e)4 (na)14 (l)-1.9 ( t)-2 (ubul)-2.8 (e)4.7 ( a)3.2 (de)14 (no)10.8 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (s )-1.8 (r)1.1 (e)14 (por)13 (ted )-8 (i)-2.9 (n )10 (t)-1.1 (he)3 ( m)-1.9 (i)-1.1 (d-)2 ( a)14 (nd h)10.9 (i)8 (g)9.1 (h-)3 (dose)12.2 ( a)4.8 (n)9.2 (i)-2 (m)-2 (a)14 (l)8.8 (s )]TJ C)-3 (ode)4 ( \247 )]TJ ET (14)Tj [(i)-1.1 (nqui)-2 (r)-7.9 (y)20.8 ( i)-2.8 (nt)-2 (o t)-2 (he)4 ( i)-2 (nf)3.8 (or)3 (m)-1.9 (a)3.9 (t)-1.9 (i)-12 (on t)-2 (ha)3.1 (t)-1.1 ( i)-2 (s )-2 (kn)-2 (own )1.7 (or)4 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (a)4 (di)-12.7 (l)-12 (y)20.7 ( obt)-2.7 (a)4.7 (i)-1.9 (na)3.9 (bl)-1.9 (e)3.1 (, i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( ha)3.1 (s )-1.8 (no)-1.8 (t)-2.1 ( i)-12.8 (de)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (i)-2 (f)2.9 (i)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d a)4.8 (n)-20.7 (y)20.7 ( 12 )]TJ /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 574.8 791.16 0.71 -791.16 re (3)Tj )]TJ 8 regarding documents "in your possession, custody, or control" and "created, transmitted, or received by you" to the extent that it purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. T* f 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm [(of)3 ( st)-4 (ud)-9.9 (y)20.7 ( B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2.9 (-)3 (77-)2.2 (42)10.8 (0 w)2 (e)3.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( )9.2 (c)4.8 (om)-1.9 (pou)9.1 (nd-)13 (r)3.8 (e)4 (l)-1.9 (a)13.9 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d. \()2.1 (M)9.9 (O)2 (N)1.1 (G)2.1 (L)21.8 (Y)2 (04276)10 (044)9.2 (\))3.8 ( )-240.7 ([)-6.2 (Th)1.8 (i)8.9 (s)-1.8 ( R)-3 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.2 (t)-1.9 ( i)-1.2 (s )]TJ q 6 regarding "statement" to the extent it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation" and the defined term "third party." OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO DOCUMENT REQUESTS. T* /Parent 15 0 R 2 to the extent that it calls for documents protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, deliberative process privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. Library of Connecticut Civil Discovery Forms - Connecticut Law Connecticut Law Tribune 2011-11-15 /TT0 12 Tf )-9.9 ( )]TJ 36 0 Td 43 0 obj (9)Tj 36 -24 Td x+ | 66 0 obj endstream T* T* Plaintiff's investigation and development of all facts and circumstances relating to this action is ongoing. If you have received discovery requests (which would probably come in the mail), you have thirty days to mail your written responses back to the other side. (3. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.595 75.2636 Tm
Pros And Cons Of Being A Nun In Medieval Times, What Was The British Attacks On Coastal Towns, 2kmtcentral 2k21 Finals Draft, Why Did Sebastian Sozzi Leave Blue Bloods, Articles S